fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple
Date: 2019-02-01 16:24:04
Message-ID: 20190201162404.onngi77f26baem4g@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

While working on the patch to slotify trigger.c I got somewhat confused
by the need to expand tuples in trigger.c:

static HeapTuple
GetTupleForTrigger(EState *estate,
EPQState *epqstate,
ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
ItemPointer tid,
LockTupleMode lockmode,
TupleTableSlot **newSlot)
{
...
if (HeapTupleHeaderGetNatts(tuple.t_data) < relation->rd_att->natts)
result = heap_expand_tuple(&tuple, relation->rd_att);
else
result = heap_copytuple(&tuple);
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);

There's no explanation why GetTupleForTrigger() needs expanding tuples,
but most other parts of postgres don't. Normally deforming ought to take
care of expanding missing attrs.

As far as I can tell, the reason that it's needed is that heap_gettar()
wasn't updated along the rest of the functions. heap_deform_tuple(),
heap_attisnull() etc look for missing attrs, but heap_getattr() doesn't.

That, to me, makes no sense. The reason that we see a difference in
regression test output is that composite_to_json() uses heap_getattr(),
if it used heap_deform_tuple (which'd be considerably faster), we'd get
the default value.

Am I missing something?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2019-02-01 17:14:19 Re: initdb --allow-group-access behaviour in windows
Previous Message Matwey V. Kornilov 2019-02-01 16:08:00 [PATCH 3/3] Add initial support for spgist quadtree @<(point,circle) operator