From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Adam Berlin <berlin(dot)ab(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition |
Date: | 2019-01-29 21:12:40 |
Message-ID: | 20190129211240.cywvfn2upqtan3ns@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019-01-30 10:05:35 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 04:22, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > I think I might have a patch addressing the problem incidentally. For pluggable storage I slotified copy.c, which also removes the first heap_form_tuple. Quite possible that nothing more is needed. I've removed the batch context altogether in yesterday's rebase, there was no need anymore.
>
> In your patch, where do the batched tuples get stored before the heap
> insert is done?
There's one slot for each batched tuple (they are reused). Before
materialization the tuples solely exist in tts_isnull/values into which
NextCopyFrom() directly parses the values. Tuples never get extracted
from the slot in copy.c itself anymore, table_multi_insert() accepts
slots. Not quite sure whether I've answered your question?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2019-01-29 21:33:30 | Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2019-01-29 21:09:12 | Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition |