Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()?
Date: 2019-01-28 23:49:33
Message-ID: 20190128234933.ioateictsk3qmsuf@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-01-28 18:08:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I'm inclined to put back the
> > LockBuffer(buf, BUFFER_LOCK_UNLOCK);
> > LockRelationForExtension(onerel, ExclusiveLock);
> > UnlockRelationForExtension(onerel, ExclusiveLock);
> > LockBufferForCleanup(buf);
> > if (PageIsNew(page))
> > dance regardless, just to get the buildfarm to green?
>
> The buildfarm's got half a dozen reports now of a failure of this ilk,
> so you'd better do something.

Yea, I was working on a patch. Was trying to come up with an explanation
of how this can be realistically hit on the BF, but failed. I've pushed
something now, let's see whether that fixes it.

> > But I do wonder if we should just make hio.c cope with this instead.
>
> Probably should not try to go that way under time presssure.

Definitely.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2019-01-29 00:29:02 Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Previous Message Nikita Glukhov 2019-01-28 23:18:23 Re: jsonpath