Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal
Date: 2019-01-25 23:46:14
Message-ID: 20190125234614.GH13803@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 06:41:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I assume this means we would only keep the current release notes in the
> > git tree too, e.g. 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, etc.
>
> Yeah, I'd imagine that each branch would have just its own release notes.
>
> I'm not sure whether to apply this policy retroactively to the supported
> back branches or just establish it going forward. Maintaining the notes
> could be pretty confusing for the next few years if we do the latter,
> though.

Agreed. We would need to backpatch.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2019-01-26 01:32:12 Re: First SVG graphic
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-01-25 23:41:20 Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal