From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ArchiveEntry optional arguments refactoring |
Date: | 2019-01-23 17:25:09 |
Message-ID: | 20190123172509.q6lh4rytksfrcj3e@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-01-23 12:22:23 -0500, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 1/23/19 12:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2019-01-23 12:05:10 -0500, Chapman Flack wrote:
> >> [1] https://github.com/NetBSD/src/blob/trunk/sys/sys/midiio.h#L709
>
> > I'm not really seeing this being more than obfuscation in this case. The
> > only point of the macro is to set the .tag and .op elements to something
> > without adding redundancies due to the struct name. Which we'd not have.
>
> Granted, that example is more elaborate than this case, but writing
>
>
> ArchiveEntry(fout, dbCatId, dbDumpId, .tag = datname, .owner = dba,
> .desc = "DATABASE", .section = SECTION_PRE_DATA,
> .defn = creaQry->data, .dropStmt = delQry->data);
>
> instead of
>
> ArchiveEntry(fout, dbCatId, dbDumpId, &(ArchiveOpts){.tag = datname,
> .owner = dba, .desc = "DATABASE",
> .section = SECTION_PRE_DATA, .defn = creaQry->data,
> .dropStmt = delQry->data});
>
> would be easy, and still save a bit of visual noise.
IDK, it'd be harder to parse correctly as a C programmer though. I'm up
with a wrapper macro like
#define ARCHIVE_ARGS(...) &(ArchiveOpts){__VA_ARGS__}
but weirdly mixing struct arguments and normal function arguments seems
quite confusing.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-01-23 17:32:06 | Re: ArchiveEntry optional arguments refactoring |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-01-23 17:23:28 | Re: ArchiveEntry optional arguments refactoring |