| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Adam Berlin <berlin(dot)ab(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition |
| Date: | 2019-01-21 01:24:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20190121012405.633row4iw7nfxz7h@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019-01-20 00:24:05 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 1/14/19 10:25 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > On 12/13/18 8:09 AM, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:28 PM Tomas Vondra
> >> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com <mailto:tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Can you also update the docs to mention that the functions called from
> >> the WHERE clause does not see effects of the COPY itself?
> >>
> >>
> >> /Of course, i also add same comment to insertion method selection
> >> /
> >
> > FWIW I've marked this as RFC and plan to get it committed this week.
> >
>
> Pushed, thanks for the patch.
While rebasing the pluggable storage patch ontop of this I noticed that
the qual appears to be evaluated in query context. Isn't that a bad
idea? ISMT it should have been evaluated a few lines above, before the:
/* Triggers and stuff need to be invoked in query context. */
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);
Yes, that'd require moving the ExecStoreHeapTuple(), but that seems ok?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-01-21 01:29:09 | Re: Allowing extensions to find out the OIDs of their member objects |
| Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2019-01-21 01:07:05 | Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards |