From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Restrict the use of temporary namespace in two-phase transaction |
Date: | 2019-01-19 01:12:00 |
Message-ID: | 20190119011200.GA3306@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 09:08:27AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 03:34:30PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Seems hard to avoid. We could conceivably make it return "pg_temp"
>> for the temp schema instead of the schema's actual name, but it's
>> not very hard to think of ways whereby that would make use of the
>> result fail in contexts where it previously worked.
>
> CREATE EXTENSION is one such case. It would not work if referring to
> the synonym pg_temp, but it can work if using directly the temporary
> namespace of the session. So I feel that changing such things is
> prone to break more things than to actually fix things.
As long as I don't forget about it.. current_schema() is classified
as stable, so it's not like we can make it return pg_temp and then the
real temporary schema name within the same transaction...
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-01-19 08:51:10 | pgsql: Fix outdated comment |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-01-19 00:08:27 | Re: pgsql: Restrict the use of temporary namespace in two-phase transaction |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chapman Flack | 2019-01-19 01:20:44 | House style for DocBook documentation? |
Previous Message | andres@anarazel.de | 2019-01-19 01:09:41 | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |