Re: Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD
Date: 2019-01-16 02:07:48
Message-ID: 20190116020748.5lpniu26eercs3t4@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-01-16 11:02:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> f3db7f16 has proved that it can be a bad idea to run pg_resetwal on a
> data folder which does not match the version it has been compiled
> with.
>
> As of HEAD, PG_CONTROL_VERSION is still 1100:
> $ pg_controldata | grep "pg_control version"
> pg_control version number: 1100
>
> Wouldn't it be better to bump it up to 1200?

We don't commonly bump that without corresponding control version
changes. I don't see what we'd gain by the bump?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-01-16 02:08:40 Re: current_logfiles not following group access and instead follows log_file_mode permissions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-01-16 02:02:08 Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD