Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date: 2019-01-11 18:19:34
Message-ID: 20190111181934.g5qig23o7rxubnjt@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-01-11 11:12:25 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I actually think that we should go "all in" here and allow the user to
> specify either that they want materialization or that they don't want
> materialization. If they specify neither, then we make some decision
> which we may change in a future release. If they do specify
> something, we do that.

+many

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-01-11 18:23:53 Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-01-11 18:09:42 Re: Ryu floating point output patch