Re: speeding up planning with partitions

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Date: 2019-01-03 15:39:00
Message-ID: 20190103153900.GA6236@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I don't think I can't help with code review, but I loaded our largest
customer's schema into pg12dev and tested with this patch. It's working well -
thanks for your work.

Details follow.

We have tooo many tables+indices so this vastly improves planning speed. Our
large customers have ~300 parent tables and total ~20k child tables with total
~80k indices. Our largest tables heirarchies have ~1200 child tables, which
may have as many as 6-8 indices each. And 5-10 of the largest heirarchies are
unioned together in a view.

Running pg11.1, explaining query for the largest view with condition eliminates
all but today's tables can take several minutes with a cold cache, due to not
only stat()ing every file in every table in a partition heirarchy, before
pruning, but also actually open()ing all their indices.

Running 11dev with your v10 patch applied, this takes 2244ms with empty buffer
cache after postmaster restarted on a totally untuned instance (and a new
backend, with no cached opened files).

I was curious why it took even 2sec, and why it did so many opens() (but not
20k of them that PG11 does):

[pryzbyj(at)database postgresql]$ cut -d'(' -f1 /tmp/strace-12dev-explain |sort |uniq -c |sort -nr
2544 lseek
1263 open
...

It turns out 1050 open()s are due to historic data which is no longer being
loaded and therefor never converted to relkind=p (but hasn't exceeded the
retention interval so not yet DROPped, either).

Cheers,
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Alsup 2019-01-03 15:47:43 Unable to `make install` on MacOS in the latest master (68a13f28be)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-01-03 14:36:36 Re: pgsql: Update ssl test certificates and keys