Re: shared-memory based stats collector

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, ah(at)cybertec(dot)at, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Date: 2019-01-01 23:42:26
Message-ID: 201901012342.rc2qe2a7ymyw@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jan-01, Tomas Vondra wrote:

> I agree it's a sensitive part of the code, so additional reviews would
> be welcome of course. I've done as much review and testing as possible,
> and overall it seems in a fairly good shape. Do you have any particular
> concerns / ideas what to look for?

I haven't reviewed this patch thoroughly.

Shall we do a triage run over the complete commitfest to determine the
highest priority items that we should put extra effort into reviewing?

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-01-02 03:05:10 Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2019-01-01 23:02:30 Re: bitmaps and correlation