From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
Date: | 2005-11-09 22:42:32 |
Message-ID: | 20182.1131576152@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 11:26 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Really? After I woke up a bit more I realized there was only one bit
>> and change to spare, not two, so I don't see how it would work.
> Not sure why you think that. Seems to fit....
[ counts on fingers and toes too ... ] Obviously, I was more awake the
first time. Never mind :-(
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2005-11-09 23:28:14 | Re: Install issue on Windows and directory |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-11-09 22:24:04 | Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-11-10 05:58:51 | Re: return can contains any row or record functions |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-11-09 22:24:04 | Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |