From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) |
Date: | 2018-12-27 22:04:41 |
Message-ID: | 201812272204.fcmhdb3lrsgv@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Dec-27, Tom Lane wrote:
> I poked around a little on my own machines, and I can confirm that
> Getopt::Long is present in a default Perl install-from-source at
> least as far back as perl 5.6.1. It's barely conceivable that some
> packager might omit it from their minimal package, but Red Hat,
> Apple, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include it. So it sure looks to
> me like relying on it should be non-problematic.
In Debian it's included in package perl-modules-5.24, which packages
perl and libperl5.24 depend on. I suppose it's possible to install
perl-base and not install perl-modules, but it'd be a really bare-bones
machine. I'm not sure it's possible to build Postgres in such a
machine.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2018-12-27 22:15:55 | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-12-27 21:55:43 | Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option |