From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent? |
Date: | 2018-12-18 01:13:42 |
Message-ID: | 20181218011342.57tibn2h2kwvqxky@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Dec-18, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:36:17AM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 08:21, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Pushed with those changes. Thanks for the patch!
> >
> > Thanks for committing it and thanks for reviewing it, Michael.
>
> Perhaps too early to speak, tests of sepgsql are broken after this
> commit as per rhinoceros report:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=rhinoceros&dt=2018-12-18%2000%3A45%3A01
Ah, thanks.
I think we need to accept the new output. It is saying that previously
we would not invoke the hook on SET TABLESPACE for a partitioned table,
which makes sense, and now we do invoke it, which also makes sense.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Isaac Morland | 2018-12-18 01:43:18 | Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-12-18 01:08:44 | Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent? |