Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2018-12-17 21:52:51
Message-ID: 20181217215251.7fd5egmmw6ld3xxv@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Dec-17, Robert Haas wrote:

> I have done a bit more work on this, but need to spend some more time
> on it before I have something that is worth posting. Not sure whether
> I'll get to that before the New Year at this point.

This patch missing the CF deadline would not be a happy way for me to
begin the new year.

I'm not sure what's the best way to move forward with this patch, but I
encourage you to post whatever version you have before the deadline,
even if you're not fully happy with it (and, heck, even if it doesn't
compile and/or is full of FIXME or TODO comments).

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message legrand legrand 2018-12-17 21:56:20 Re: explain plans with information about (modified) gucs
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-12-17 20:36:17 Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent?