| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2018-12-16 06:34:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20181216063457.GG5012@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 09:00:58AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Dec-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Do you happen to have a link for that? I didn't find anything.
The message I was thinking about is close to here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20121210152856.GC16664@awork2.anarazel.de
> I think putting the CONCURRENTLY in the parenthesized list of options is
> most sensible.
For new options of VACUUM and ANALYZE we tend to prefer that as well,
and this simplifies the query parsing.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-12-16 06:43:25 | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-12-16 06:03:07 | Re: select limit error in file_fdw |