Re: minor leaks in pg_dump (PG tarball 10.6)

Greetings,

* Pavel Raiskup (praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com) wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 5, 2018 4:59:18 PM CET Stephen Frost wrote:
> > This change doesn't seem to make any sense to me..? If anything, seems
> > like we'd end up overallocating memory *after* this change, where we
> > don't today (though an analyzer tool might complain because we don't
> > free the memory from it and instead copy the pointer from each of these
> > items into the tbinfo structure).
>
> Correct, I haven't think that one through. I was confused that some items
> related to the dropped columns could be unreferenced. But those are
> anyways allocated as a solid block with others (not intended to be ever
> free()'d). Feel free to ignore that.

Right.

I've pushed the other changes.

Thanks!

Stephen