| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: reducing isolation tests runtime |
| Date: | 2018-12-04 20:17:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20181204201755.3lthtxjqre4ux6sd@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Dec-04, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to see this revived, getting a bit tired waiting longer and
> longer to see isolationtester complete. Is it really a problem that we
> require a certain number of connections? Something on the order of 30-50
> connections ought not to be a real problem for realistic machines, and
> if it's a problem for one, they can use a serialized schedule?
Hello
Yeah, me too. Let me see about it.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-12-04 20:45:39 | Re: reducing isolation tests runtime |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-12-04 19:42:16 | Re: reducing isolation tests runtime |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-12-04 20:31:48 | make install getting slower |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-12-04 19:42:16 | Re: reducing isolation tests runtime |