Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
Subject: Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm
Date: 2018-11-30 01:48:00
Message-ID: 20181130014800.GC2267@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> Nothing changed since then, but also the patch got not enough review to say
> that there was substantial feedback. I'll move it to the next CF.

I would have suggested to mark the patch as returned with feedback
instead as the thing does not apply for some time now, and the author
has been notified about a rebase.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-30 01:50:04 Re: Removing remaining parallel-build hazards in ecpg
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-30 01:44:33 Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups