Re: Michael Paquier 2018-11-29 <20181129085902(dot)GD9004(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 09:47:09AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > A customer was complaining that the "checkpoint starting: xlog"
> > message was not included in the grand PG10 rename of user-visible
> > bits. The attached patch fixes that.
>
> At the same time it would make sense to rename CHECKPOINT_CAUSE_XLOG? I
> would not risk back-patching such a change as that would be annoying for
> tools parsing logs like pgbadger.
There's hundreds of other internal uses of xlog that were not touched
either, only the user-facing parts were changed.
If this gets accepted, I'll submit a patch for pgbadger so it can be
updated before PG12 hits the field.
Christoph