Re: VOPS-2.0

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VOPS-2.0
Date: 2018-11-28 13:45:37
Message-ID: 20181128134537.axmzm2sscjgkbw5l@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announce pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Nov-28, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 01:01:03PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to introduce new version of VOPS extension for Postgres (vectorized
> > operations) providing new, more convenient way of usage:
> > auto-substitution of projections.
>
> [Announce post moved to hackers.]
>
> I remember the good performance numbers from this feature. How does
> this interact with the JIT executor feature, which is also designed to
> speed up the executor? Is it something that can be combined with JIT?

ISTM that VOPS is a temporary hack that we'll need to include in some
form eventually, but that basing it on top of pluggable storage would be
a better way forward than the current proposal.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

  • Re: VOPS-2.0 at 2018-11-28 14:08:06 from Konstantin Knizhnik

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2018-11-28 13:56:21 Re: VOPS-2.0
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-11-28 13:18:00 Re: VOPS-2.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-11-28 13:46:51 Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-11-28 13:43:35 Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query