From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sanyo Moura <sanyo(dot)moura(at)tatic(dot)net> |
Cc: | jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |
Date: | 2018-11-28 01:27:13 |
Message-ID: | 20181128012713.GF30707@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 06:44:02PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:17 AM Sanyo Moura <sanyo(dot)moura(at)tatic(dot)net> wrote:
> >>> I'm running performance tests for my application at version 11.1 and
> >>> encountered queries with high planning time compared to the same planning,
> >>> running at versions 10.5 and 11.0.
>
> I was able to reproduce this behavior.
I take that back, in part..
My query (with One-Time Filter: false) has high planning time under 11.0, also:
| Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=24)
| One-Time Filter: false
|Time: 48335.098 ms (00:48.335)
Justin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-11-28 01:32:11 | Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-11-28 01:17:12 | Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sanyo Moura | 2018-11-28 01:36:09 | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |
Previous Message | Sanyo Moura | 2018-11-28 01:00:39 | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |