Re: Running pg_upgrade Version 11

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: rob stone <floriparob(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Running pg_upgrade Version 11
Date: 2018-11-27 14:40:19
Message-ID: 20181127144019.GB16856@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:30:18AM +1100, rob stone wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 15:17 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:27:35PM +1100, rob stone wrote:
> > > Logged in as user postgres and postgres owns the files created by
> > > initdb, so is this a permissions problem or am I having a brain
> > > fade?
> >
> > Having 0600 as umask for those files is normal. Don't you have more
> > logs about the error? You should not see this error, except if
> > data_v10
> > is not a data folder initialized correctly, so perhaps you messed up
> > something in your environment?
> > --
> > Michael
>
>
>
> Problem caused by my eyesight.
> A colleague pointed out the typo in the argument to the -d parameter.
> Working as intended.

Should the error message be improved?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-11-27 14:47:40 Re: Upgrade Standby
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2018-11-25 15:36:29 Re: Question about index on different tablespace and rebuild it