Re: CF app feature request

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CF app feature request
Date: 2018-11-20 18:30:38
Message-ID: 20181120183038.66fty4nxeoqi7gv7@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Nov-20, Tom Lane wrote:

> I think there is a use-case for "Withdrawn", it's more polite than
> "Rejected" ;-). But it's not a very high-priority request.

Certainly not higher than having the dropdown for entry author/reviewer
be sorted alphabetically ... *wink* *wink*

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-11-20 19:09:59 Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-11-20 18:19:21 Re: CF app feature request