Re: typo fix

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: typo fix
Date: 2018-11-20 07:15:56
Message-ID: 20181120071556.GL4400@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:58:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The reason that's not good is that it creates a singular-plural mismatch.
> If you'd also changed "PathKeys" to "PathKey", it would still read OK,
> though I don't think it's an improvement particularly.
>
> (Hm ... though arguably, "structure" should be "structures" if we're
> going to let it stand as plural.)

Indeed, missed that. This first sentence mentions "orderings" for those
PathKeys, which refers to multiple PathKeys, so actually Amit's patch
seems to be fine, no?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haozhou Wang 2018-11-20 07:20:27 Re: Control your disk usage in PG: Introduction to Disk Quota Extension
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-11-20 06:58:22 Re: typo fix