Re: Sync ECPG scanner with core

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sync ECPG scanner with core
Date: 2018-11-13 18:56:53
Message-ID: 20181113185653.j5obfvaxkg6nu3kk@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Nov-13, Tom Lane wrote:

> More generally, I wonder if it'd be practical to make pgc.l backup-free
> altogether. I'm not sure that the resulting gain in lexing speed would
> really be of interest to anyone,

Maybe time to compile the ecpg test cases during "make check-world"?

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-11-13 19:01:45 Re: Sync ECPG scanner with core
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-11-13 18:43:30 Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue