From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: fix psql \conninfo & \connect when using hostaddr |
Date: | 2018-11-09 01:14:14 |
Message-ID: | 20181109011414.GB2652@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 12:13:31PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Nov-08, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Visually, however, I think this is better off with braces because
>> it *looks* like a multi-line if-block. The braces also make it
>> clear that your intent was not, say,
>>
>> while (some-mutable-condition)
>> /* skip */ ;
>> do_something_else();
>
> Right, that too. Fortunately I think compilers warn about mismatching
> indentation nowadays, at least in some cases.
I don't recall seeing a compiler warning about that, but I do recall
coverity complaining loudly about such things. It is better style to
use braces if there is one line of code with a comment block in my
opinion. And there is no need for braces if there is no comment.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-11-09 01:16:02 | Strange corruption in psql output on mereswine |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-11-09 01:10:13 | Re: ON COMMIT actions and inheritance |