| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes |
| Date: | 2018-11-08 19:24:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20181108192447.noq6adistqmhzgaj@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-11-07 14:25:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> We need to move forward, either by undertaking a more extensive
> clean-out, or by finding a path to a version of the code that is
> satisfactory.
> [...]
> In short, it seems likely to me that large parts of this patch need to
> be pulled out, rewritten, and then put back in different places than
> they are today. I'm not sure if a complete revert is the best next
> step, or if we can make progress without that.
I think the feature has merit, but I don't think it makes that much
sense to start with the current in-tree version. There's just too many
architectural issues. So I think we should clean it out as much as we
can, and then have the feature re-submitted with proper review etc.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-11-08 19:39:40 | Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-11-08 19:22:42 | Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables |