Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces
Date: 2018-11-07 16:40:02
Message-ID: 20181107164002.p6y7yugehihcsqi6@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-11-07 11:19:53 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:46 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > I think 11.0 is ready for testing that a migration from a production
> > running 10.x, but not for just blindly migrating. If you wanted to take
> > such a leap of faith, surely you'd wait for 11.1 at the very least.
>
> I think that's an irresponsible attitude for a committer to take. In
> practice, you are probably right, but we shouldn't treat our
> supposedly-stable releases as if they don't really need to be kept
> stable. That's a recipe for anybody back-patching anything they feel
> like whenever they like, which is a recipe for disaster.

+1

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-11-07 16:41:14 Re: Connection limit doesn't work for superuser
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2018-11-07 16:36:54 Re: csv format for psql