From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ondřej Bouda <obouda(at)email(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally |
Date: | 2018-11-06 21:54:49 |
Message-ID: | 20181106215449.wwssxsktwybhlf52@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Nov-06, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?Q?Ond=c5=99ej_Bouda?= <obouda(at)email(dot)cz> writes:
> >> Ondřej, as a short-term workaround you could prevent the crash
> >> by setting that index's recheck_on_update property to false.
>
> > Thanks for the tip. I am unsuccessful using it, though:
> > # ALTER INDEX public.schedulecard_overlap_idx SET (recheck_on_update =
> > FALSE);
> > ERROR: unrecognized parameter "recheck_on_update"
>
> Oh, for crying out loud. That's yet a different bug.
> I'm not sure that it's the fault of the recheck_on_update
> feature proper though; it might be a pre-existing bug in
> the reloptions code. Looks like somebody forgot to list
> RELOPT_KIND_GIST in RELOPT_KIND_INDEX, but is that the
> fault of commit c203d6cf8 or was it busted before?
RELOPT_KIND_INDEX was invented by that commit, looks like :-(
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-11-06 21:54:57 | Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-11-06 21:47:20 | Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-11-06 21:54:57 | Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-11-06 21:52:44 | Re: Special role for subscriptions |