Re: pg_promote not marked as parallel-restricted in pg_proc.dat
From:
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: pg_promote not marked as parallel-restricted in pg_proc.dat
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 08:02:36AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > So anybody has an objection with marking the function as parallel-safe? > I'd like to do so if that's not the case and close the case.