Re: Unused entry in pg_opfamily

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unused entry in pg_opfamily
Date: 2018-11-05 01:12:35
Message-ID: 20181105011235.GB1718@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 08:02:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> We should, therefore, at least add an oprsanity check for
> opfamilies without opclasses. I wonder how far it's worth
> going to check for other orphaned catalog entries.

+1.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2018-11-05 02:20:36 Re: Code of Conduct plan,Re: Code of Conduct plan,Re: Code of Conduct plan,Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-11-05 01:02:25 Unused entry in pg_opfamily