| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Cc: | andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench -M option can be specified more than once |
| Date: | 2018-11-03 12:00:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20181103.210046.1700165445229024615.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> On 2018-11-03 10:12:14 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>> One of my colleagues actually believed that if both "-M extended" and
>>> "-M prepared" were specified, pgbench runs in mixture of those
>>> modes. So I felt avoiding such misunderstanding is more important.
>
>> I regularly specify options multiple times, and I'd hate for that to not
>> work anymore. It's really useful to set defaults for scripts that then
>> can be overwritten by the caller by passing on "$@" (i.e. all script
>> arguments).
>
> Yeah, there's an ancient tradition that "last switch wins" when receiving
> conflicting command-line options. I think we should tread very carefully
> in breaking that.
Yes, I think that is a fair argument. Proposal withdrawn.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-11-03 12:12:27 | Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-11-03 11:03:06 | Re: pread() and pwrite() |