Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces
Date: 2018-11-02 16:15:32
Message-ID: 20181102161532.dwttt6ep7qfno2m7@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Nov-02, Robert Haas wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:02 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > > By the way, if we decide to do something about this, I think we do the
> > > same for partitioned tables.
> >
> > I'm up for changing the behavior of partitioned tables in pg12 (please
> > send a patch), but I'm up for changing the behavior of partitioned
> > tables in pg11.
>
> Uh, what?

Sorry, I just realized the typo in the above. The behavior I propose to
change in pg11 is that of partitioned *indexes*, not tables.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-11-02 16:15:47 Re: WIP Patch: Add a function that returns binary JSONB as a bytea
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-11-02 16:15:18 Re: PG vs macOS Mojave