Re: NOTIFY does not work as expected

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrey <parihaaraka(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOTIFY does not work as expected
Date: 2018-10-20 00:32:29
Message-ID: 20181020003229.hdlavlcrr6ioyynl@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2018-10-19 20:27:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I find the +1, 0, -1 pretty confusing and less clear than what was there
> > before. If we do something like it, could we introduce an enum or macros
> > for it?
>
> Meh. Shall I just go back to the blocked/not blocked approach?

+1

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-10-20 00:36:36 Re: NOTIFY does not work as expected
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-10-20 00:27:20 Re: NOTIFY does not work as expected