From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL/Java 1.5.1 |
Date: | 2018-10-19 10:07:54 |
Message-ID: | 20181019100754.GA1394@msg.df7cb.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-pkg-debian pgsql-pkg-yum |
Re: Chapman Flack 2018-10-19 <5BC92CB0(dot)2020007(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
> Was there some objection in principle (or maybe just download size) to
> building with -Psaxon-examples ?
I'm just lacking time atm, I filed your last mail as
https://salsa.debian.org/postgresql/postgresql-pljava/issues/1
so it doesn't get lost completely.
> If it is not objectionable, my preference would be to build with that
> option (whenever the PG version >= 8.4 anyway).
>
> A lot of the examples are just toy learning aids or tests, but the Saxon
> examples are there for a useful, non-trivial purpose: to give real SQL:2006+
> XML Query functionality, which core PG still lacks.
>
> So I would like to make it as easy as possible for the user to try out
> those examples. Even leaving the Saxon library as an optional download,
> so one extra thing would have to be downloaded before those examples
> work, that would still be less fuss than having to build the example
> code separately AND download the library.
>
> What do you think?
It makes a lot of sense. If I should forget, could you ping me again
once the whole upload-everything-for-PG11 dust has settled in a few
weeks?
Christoph
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | apt.postgresql.org repository | 2018-10-19 10:18:13 | postgresql-multicorn updated to version 1.3.4-3.pgdg+1 |
Previous Message | apt.postgresql.org repository | 2018-10-19 08:48:29 | postgresql-plproxy updated to version 2.8-2.pgdg+1 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gražvydas Valeika | 2018-10-20 21:55:47 | Re: Postgis for Fedora 28 |
Previous Message | Ian Barwick | 2018-10-19 02:43:32 | Re: PG 11 CentOS 6 => 404? |