From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: AllocSetContextCreate changes breake extensions |
Date: | 2018-10-12 17:56:55 |
Message-ID: | 20181012175655.wl4hh475ehthoohi@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-10-12 13:51:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > But can't we just do something like:
>
> > #if defined(HAVE__BUILTIN_CONSTANT_P) && defined(HAVE__VA_ARGS)
> > #define AllocSetContextCreate(parent, name, ...) \
> > (StaticAssertExpr(__builtin_constant_p(name), \
> > "memory context names must be constant strings"), \
> > AllocSetContextCreateExtended(parent, name, __VA_ARGS__))
> > #else
> > #define AllocSetContextCreate \
> > AllocSetContextCreateExtended
> > #endif
>
> > The set of compilers that have __builtin_constant_p and not vararg
> > macros got to be about empty.
>
> Yeah, fair point, and anyway we don't need the StaticAssert to exist
> everywhere. I'll make it so.
Cool.
> Shall we also backpatch the ALLOCSET_*_SIZES macros as Christoph
> suggested? I'm not convinced of the usefulness of that, since
> extensions would still have to cope with them not being present
> when building against existing minor releases.
I'd do so. Many extensions are fine just building against a relatively
new minor release. Won't help extension authors in the next few months,
but after that...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-10-12 18:00:07 | Re: Multi-insert into a partitioned table with before insert row trigger causes server crash on latest HEAD |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-10-12 17:51:53 | Re: AllocSetContextCreate changes breake extensions |