| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel |
| Date: | 2018-10-09 21:37:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20181009213709.6dpkhlqdppnjpzxs@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-10-09 17:27:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > As discussed below (at [1]), I think we should remove $subject. I plan
> > to do so, unless somebody protests soon-ish. I thought it'd be better
> > to call attention to this in a new thread, to make sure people had a
> > chance to object.
>
> I complained about this already on the other thread, I think, but:
> I do not think we should remove timeofday(). It's unrelated to these
> datatypes and it offers functionality that isn't quite duplicated
> elsewhere.
Ok. I find it a somewhat weird function, but I agree it's not strongly
related. It only came up because it's implemented in nabstime.c. Moving
it to utils/adt/timestamp.c seems to make the most sense?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-10-09 21:39:09 | Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-10-09 21:27:17 | Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel |