Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
Date: 2018-10-09 21:37:09
Message-ID: 20181009213709.6dpkhlqdppnjpzxs@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-10-09 17:27:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > As discussed below (at [1]), I think we should remove $subject. I plan
> > to do so, unless somebody protests soon-ish. I thought it'd be better
> > to call attention to this in a new thread, to make sure people had a
> > chance to object.
>
> I complained about this already on the other thread, I think, but:
> I do not think we should remove timeofday(). It's unrelated to these
> datatypes and it offers functionality that isn't quite duplicated
> elsewhere.

Ok. I find it a somewhat weird function, but I agree it's not strongly
related. It only came up because it's implemented in nabstime.c. Moving
it to utils/adt/timestamp.c seems to make the most sense?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-10-09 21:39:09 Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-10-09 21:27:17 Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel