| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade failed with ERROR: null relpartbound for relation 18159 error. |
| Date: | 2018-10-07 14:13:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20181007141319.xpj7bzi24kyyysz6@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Oct-07, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 10:15:32PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Pushed to 11 and master. I'm not convinced that it's a good idea to
> > mess with 10 at this point -- the partitioning code is rather completely
> > different already ...
>
> While I definitely agree with you to not mess up with this portion of
> the partitioning code for REL_10_STABLE, I think that we have a good set
> of arguments to get the regression test into this branch. This
> particular case has been broken while developing v11, hence it would be
> nice to get the insurance that any future bug fix applying to
> REL_10_STABLE does not break it again.
Good point. I cannot do that today, but if you want to, please go
ahead.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-10-07 15:09:13 | Re: pg_upgrade failed with ERROR: null relpartbound for relation 18159 error. |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-10-07 12:17:31 | DSM segment handle generation in background workers |