Re: transction_timestamp() inside of procedures

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: transction_timestamp() inside of procedures
Date: 2018-09-26 00:47:39
Message-ID: 20180926004739.GA15378@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 03:01:31PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:35:02PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Does the SQL standard have anything to say about CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in
> > procedures?  Do we need another function that does advance on procedure
> > commit?
>
> I found a section in the SQL standards that talks about it, but I don't
> understand it.  Can I quote the paragraph here?
>
>
> I've seen others do it; and small sections of copyrighted material posted for
> commentary or critique would likely be covered by "fair use" exemptions.

Well, it is an entire paragraph, so it might be too much. If you
download the zip file here:

http://www.wiscorp.com/sql200n.zip

and open 5CD2-02-Foundation-2006-01.pdf, at the top of page 289 under
General Rules, paragraph label 3 has the description. It talks about
procedure statements and trigger functions, which seems promising.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-09-26 00:55:09 Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-09-26 00:10:39 Re: pgsql: Remove absolete function TupleDescGetSlot().