| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction |
| Date: | 2018-09-25 23:39:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20180925233905.ivdjorv75fajuxgb@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-09-04 18:35:34 +0530, Amit Khandekar wrote:
> The attached v11 tar has the above set of changes.
- I've pushed 0003 - although that commit seems to have included a lot
of things unrelated to the commit message. I guess two patches have
accidentally been merged? Could you split out the part of the changes
that was mis-squashed?
- I've pushed an extended version of 0001.
- I've pushed 0002, after some minor polishing
- I've pushed 0004
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-09-25 23:40:26 | Re: transction_timestamp() inside of procedures |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-09-25 23:22:23 | Re: PG vs macOS Mojave |