On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:03:28 +0900
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 03:47:26PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Anyway, considering it's a static function, chance of breaking
> > backward compatibility is minimum, I think.
> >
> > So +1 to remove the unused argument.
>
> Same opinion and arguments here, so I have committed the patch.
Thanks!
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>