Re: Code of Conduct

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, James Keener <jim(at)jimkeener(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct
Date: 2018-09-18 17:14:30
Message-ID: 20180918171430.GF4184@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Greetings,

* Chris Travers (chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> I said I would stand aside my objections after the last point I mentioned
> them but I did not feel that my particular objection and concern with
> regard to one specific sentence added got much of a hearing. This being
> said, it is genuinely hard to sort through the noise and try to reach the
> signal. I think the resurgence of the debate about whether we need a code
> of conduct made it very difficult to discuss specific objections to
> specific wording. So to be honest the breakdown was mutual.

I would ask that you, and anyone else who has a suggestion for how to
improve or revise the CoC, submit your ideas to the committee by
email'ing coc(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)

As was discussed previously, the current CoC isn't written in stone and
it will be changed and amended as needed.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-09-18 18:35:54 Re: Code of Conduct
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-09-18 17:10:26 Re: Select into table%ROWTYPE failed

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hironobu SUZUKI 2018-09-18 17:15:51 Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function
Previous Message Chris Travers 2018-09-18 17:08:09 Re: Code of Conduct