From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr, bpd0018(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData |
Date: | 2018-09-10 10:24:15 |
Message-ID: | 20180910.192415.2069028556845661211.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Hello Bradley & Tatsuo-san,
>>
>>>> ... references to the protocol version lacks homogeneity.
>>>> ... I'd suggest to keep "the vX.0 protocol" for a short version,
>>>> and "the version X.0 protocol" for long ...
>>>
>>> I agree. Change made.
>>
>> Patch applies cleanly. Doc build ok.
>>
>> One part talks about "terminating line", the other of "termination
>> line". I wonder whether one is better than the other?
>
> I am not a native English speaker so I maybe wrong... for me, current
> usage of "terminating line", and "termination line" looks correct. The
> former refers to concrete example thus uses "the", while the latter
> refers to more general case thus uses "an".
>
> BTW, I think the patch should apply to master and REL_11_STABLE
> branches at least. But should this be applied to other back branches
> as well?
I have marked this as "ready for committer".
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2018-09-10 10:40:25 | Re: Latest HEAD fails to build |
Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-09-10 10:19:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots |