| From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp |
| Cc: | amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes |
| Date: | 2018-08-30 06:01:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20180830.150124.146987419.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:10:15 +0900, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <20180829201015(dot)d9d4fde2748910e86a13c0da(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:01:53 +0530
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > > By the way, I think we can fix this also by clearing the header information of the last
> > > page instead of setting a checksum to the unused page although I am not sure which way
> > > is better.
> > >
> >
> > I think that can complicate the WAL logging of this operation which we
> > are able to deal easily with log_newpage and it sounds quite hacky.
> > The fix I have posted seems better, but I am open to suggestions.
>
> Thank you for your explanation. I understood this way could make the
> codes complicated, so I think the way you posted is better.
FWIW, I confirmed that this is the only place where smgrextend
for non-zero pages is not preceded by checksum calculation.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-08-30 06:14:26 | Re: Fix comments of IndexInfo |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-08-30 05:42:09 | Re: A strange GiST error message or fillfactor of GiST build |