| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql-archive.org |
| Date: | 2018-08-22 21:48:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20180822214836.3ootfymp5bzarwjs@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Hi,
On 2018-08-22 23:38:17 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 22/08/2018 21:08, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I kinda wonder if the postgres community shouldn't do something about
> > http://www.postgresql-archive.org/. The name makes it sound somewhat
> > official, but it doesn't appear to be. At least I do not know who runs
> > it. Does somebody else?
>
> I understand the concern, but I don't think there is anything we can do.
> Our trademark policy allows this kind of thing.
Not by my reading, and if so, it'd be useless. But I agree it could be
more clearly stated. If so, afaict we couldn't prevent people from
distributing a backdoored version of postgres as postgres, which'd be
clearly absurd.
> The truth is, our archive search and navigation is not good, so there is
> a third-party opportunity for a better one. If we don't like that, we
> should make ours better.
Sure, my point isn't that we should forbid them to operate, but to get
them to use a name that doesn't sound official, and perhaps note that as
well.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2018-08-22 22:49:54 | Re: postgresql-archive.org |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-08-22 21:39:42 | Re: postgresql-archive.org |