| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with OpenSCG downloads |
| Date: | 2018-08-16 16:25:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20180816162536.5kfwz5wpnihuxswc@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 2018-08-16 16:32:00 +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 2018-08-16 16:25, Andres Freund wrote:
> > FWIW, I find this pretty damning given that there's been new security
> > release for a week: You've added no notes about it to the bigsql
> > download page. Pinged nobody, to get the downloadlinks temporarily
> > adorned with a warning on the pg site. And then there's the issue that
> > the dates besides the releases on the download page are referencing the
> > date of the newest set of minor releases, but aren't actually new.
> >
> > This is ridiculously intransparent.
>
> Is it fairly simple for us to just comment out/remove the links for now?
>
> We don't want to be pointing people to software with known security issues.
>
> We can put the links back in when the updated downloads are in place. :)
Probably don't want to remove them entirely, it might prevent people
from upgrading from an even older release with more serious issues. But
a red warning seems appropriate.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-08-16 16:36:29 | Re: FailedAssertion on partprune |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-16 16:05:08 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-08-16 18:58:36 | Re: Missing mail list archive items |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-16 16:05:08 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |