Re: remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code
Date: 2018-08-16 14:10:05
Message-ID: 20180816141005.nkw5nwkmoip57ui6@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-08-16 10:07:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2018-08-16 09:22:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The lazy man's way to get rid of it would be to put something like
> >> "int bogus = 0;" in the empty dynloader.c files. Better would be
> >> to not have the empty .c files at all, but I'm not sure how much
> >> we'd have to contort the Makefiles to support that.
>
> > If I had my druthers, we'd just remove all that configure magic for
> > selecting these files and just use ifdefs. Personally I find it
> > occasionally that they're linked into place, rather than built under
> > their original name.
>
> Even if we all agreed that was an improvement (which I'm not sure of),
> it wouldn't fix this problem would it? On affected platforms, the
> file would still be empty after preprocessing.

Well, that depends on what you put into that file, it seems
realistically combinable with a bunch of non-conditional code...

Anyway, I'm not planning to do something here right now besides putting
-Wno-empty-translation-unit into my scripts, I just wanted to make sure
people are aware that we hit this now.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-08-16 14:22:20 Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-16 14:07:04 Re: remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code