| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum process waiting on BufferPin |
| Date: | 2018-08-13 21:15:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20180813211506.spvawcczdukdxa4u@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2018-Aug-13, Don Seiler wrote:
> This afternoon I discovered an autovacuum process that had been running for
> over 6 days. It was waiting on BufferPin event. I kicked off a manual
> vacuum+analyze of the table, which automatically killed that autovacuum.
> This ran for a few minutes before it too was waiting on a BufferPin event.
> I've never witnessed a vacuum session waiting on BufferPin before.
Buffer pins are normally released quickly enough. Of course, an
idle-in-transaction session has its own problems, but even those would
normally not have buffer pins; so vacuum would run to completion without
blocking, even if no tuples would be removed.
Maybe you had a cursor that was not fully scanned before the session was
left idle -- as I recall, those can leave buffers pinned.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Seiler | 2018-08-13 21:19:42 | Re: Vacuum process waiting on BufferPin |
| Previous Message | Don Seiler | 2018-08-13 21:04:15 | Vacuum process waiting on BufferPin |