From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | madhav(at)cockroachlabs(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Multivariate statistics |
Date: | 2018-08-07 17:44:55 |
Message-ID: | 20180807174455.GE7297@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:57:52PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/multivariate-statistics-examples.html
> Description:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm a little confused by the documentation here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/multivariate-statistics-examples.html.
>
>
> In particular, the selectivity of the second query doesn't seem to match up
> with what is expected in the notes. I feel like I may be missing something?
>
>
> (I am referring to the output of this explain command: EXPLAIN (ANALYZE,
> TIMING OFF) SELECT * FROM t WHERE a = 1 AND b = 1;)
Uh, the first query shows an _estimate_ of rows=1, which does not match
the actual rows=100:
Seq Scan on t (cost=0.00..195.00 rows=1 width=8) (actual rows=100 loops=1)
The second query has it right:
Seq Scan on t (cost=0.00..195.00 rows=100 width=8) (actual rows=100 loops=1)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-08-07 17:57:42 | Re: RETURN NULL in the sample of insert trigger on partitioned table |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-08-07 17:36:59 | Re: Typo in doc or wrong EXCLUDE implementation |